Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
negative received
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "negative received" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that something was received negatively, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The feedback from the client was negative received, which affected our team's morale."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
Based on those tests, every year thousands of healthy people received toxic and expensive medicine they never needed; at the same time, thousands of sick people, whose test results were erroneously negative, received no treatment at all.
News & Media
Those participants testing HIV negative received post-test counseling and preventive messaging, and those participants testing HIV positive received post-test counseling, cotrimoxazole, referral to continued care and a follow-up plan.
Science
Specimens concordantly positive or negative received no further testing.
Science
One patient whose culture was negative received vancomycin; other patients received sensitive antibiotics from the cultures.
Control wells (control negative) received HBSS++ and cells but no extract.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
False positives were given a higher priority code at dispatch, while false negatives received a lower priority code (Table 1).
Science
The costumes initially worried Comedy Central executives, but the negative feedback received was minimal.
Wiki
Negative controls received PBS.
Science
Negative controls received the same volume of PBS buffer.
Science
Children with a negative test received the scheduled IPT treatment.
Science
The negative controls received distilled water.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing how something was received, use more common and grammatically sound phrases like "received negatively" or "received negative feedback" instead of "negative received".
Common error
Avoid placing the adjective "negative" before the verb "received" when you intend to describe the manner in which something was received. It's clearer and more grammatically correct to say something "was negatively received" or that you "received negative feedback".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "negative received" functions as a descriptor, attempting to convey that something experienced an unfavorable reception. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. It is often intended to express that something was received negatively, but the word order is non-standard.
Frequent in
Science
33.33%
News & Media
33.33%
Wiki
33.33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "negative received" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Its intended meaning is to express that something was met with an unfavorable reaction, but it's better to use more standard phrases like "received negatively" or "received negative feedback". The usage contexts span science, news, and general information, but the phrase is rare and should be avoided in formal writing. Alternatives like "poorly received" or "met with disapproval" are more appropriate and grammatically sound.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
received negative feedback
Replaces the more ambiguous noun-adjective structure with a clearer adjective-noun phrase.
was poorly received
Uses a passive construction to indicate a negative reception in general.
got a negative response
Uses "got" as a more informal alternative to "received", focusing on the response itself.
was unfavorably reviewed
Specifically refers to receiving negative reviews, often in the context of creative works.
elicited a negative reaction
Highlights the act of causing a negative response, rather than just receiving it.
met with disapproval
Emphasizes the lack of approval as the negative aspect of the reception.
faced criticism
Focuses on critical feedback as the negative element received.
drew a backlash
Indicates a strong negative reaction, often from a large group.
encountered resistance
Suggests active opposition as the negative element.
experienced a negative outcome
Broadly refers to any negative result or consequence that was received.
FAQs
How can I use "negative received" correctly?
While "negative received" is not standard English, it's better to use phrases like "received negatively" or "received negative feedback" for clarity.
What are some alternatives to "negative received"?
Consider using alternatives such as "poorly received", "unfavorably reviewed", or "met with disapproval" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "negative feedback received" or "negative feedback was received"?
"Negative feedback was received" is generally preferred as it follows a more standard grammatical structure. "Negative feedback received" can sometimes be used in headings or brief summaries, but the passive voice is more common in formal writing.
What's the difference between "negative received" and "negatively received"?
"Negative received" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "negatively received", where "negatively" is an adverb modifying the verb "received", indicating the manner of reception.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested