"negative publications" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to written materials that contain critical or unfavorable information or opinions. Example: The company's reputation was greatly damaged due to the negative publications in the media about their unethical business practices.
Publication bias usually occurs when negative publications (in our case studies with a low DOR) with a small sample size are not published.
Because we were particularly interested in negative publications, articles were categorized for analysis as "unsafe" versus "other" and as "ineffective" versus "other".
While the precision performance of the classifier is far from perfect, the large numbers of negative publications captured by the SR topic query means that moderate precision performance results in filtering out quite a large number of these false negatives – preventing them from signalling an alert.
For more in-depth discussions of proper study design and fascinating phenomena like negative publication bias, I highly recommended Bad Science by Ben Goldacre.
Significant asymmetry was noted in the funnel plot, indicating a considerable degree of negative publication bias.
For instance, science journalism articles (newspapers) that presented a negative publication tendency regarding SSRIs (ratio=0.7) could not be related to the positive publication tendency found in scientific journals.
Publication bias may play a role in our findings, though we think the strong negative publication record in this regard limits its influence.
Among other obstacles, poor methodological and statistical standards, negative publication bias, and incomplete preclinical testing have been proposed as 'translational roadblocks'.
The collection includes correspondences, maps, blueprints, reports, minutes of meetings, photographs, negatives, slides, publications, contracts, receipts, material lists, graphs, advertisements, and news clippings.
In addition, with the same ratings on the evaluation criteria, Ra tends towards a more positive than a more negative final publication recommendation than Re.
The funnel plot of OR versus standard error was symmetric (Figure S2), and Egger's test was negative for publication bias (p = 0.38).
