Sentence examples for needless harm from inspiring English sources

Relying on its research into that relationship, Prometheus Laboratories patented a method to help doctors find the dose that is large enough to work and small enough to cause no needless harm.

The patent, owned by Prometheus Laboratories, covers a method said to help doctors find the dose that is large enough to work and small enough to cause no needless harm.

"The sentence should fit the crime for those who kill or seriously injure on our roads and it should deter other drivers from causing needless harm just for the sake of taking a call or sending a text".

Eleanor Holmes Norton, the delegate to Congress from the District of Columbia, said Mr. Dayton was sending the wrong message: "We have an obligation to avoid creating an atmosphere of fear among residents and visitors, causing needless harm to the District's economy and anxiety among the American people".

The lawsuit says: "The NHL's active and purposeful concealment of the severe risks of brain injuries exposed players to unnecessary dangers they could have avoided had the NHL provided them with truthful and accurate information and taken appropriate action to prevent needless harm".

We have the gear and the know-how to reduce the needless harm of bycatch.

ALBANY — Nearly 300,000 disabled and mentally ill New Yorkers face a "needless risk of harm" because of conflicting regulations, a lack of oversight and even disagreements over what constitutes abuse, according to a draft state report obtained by The New York Times.

In a draft of that report, reviewed by The Times in March, Mr. Sundram said that deficiencies in state law "expose vulnerable people to needless risk of harm" and made it more difficult to provide clear training to caregivers.

And if there is a will, then surely a way can be found to conciliate the defendant's right to question his accusers with the capacities of little children, and the need to protect them from needless stress and harm.

In response: We agree with Dr Collignon's view that using fluoroquinolones in the poultry industry imposes a "needless risk" of harm to humans by promoting the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections and consequent increased illness in humans (1 ).

A risk cut-point depends on the relationship between the harms of an event and the harms of needless treatment.