Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

need to be included

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"need to be included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that needs to be included in a specific situation or context. For example, "All team members need to be included in the decision-making process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Key features that need to be included in non-adiabatic simulations are finally stressed out.

Certain phenomena encountered will need to be included in a more general approach.

All sectors need to be included in the resource planning for better health.

News & Media

The Guardian

Abortion complications as cause of maternal mortality need to be included in interventions and research.

In design the second - order effects will usually need to be included.

In order to build a good model relativistic effects need to be included.

Plants need to be included to develop a comprehensive toxicity profile for nanoparticles.

However, other factors influencing adoption processes need to be included to provide fuller understanding.

People have a need to be included, to feel a sense of belonging.

Marketers need to be included in development discussions earlier in the innovation process.

Hardware and scar do not need to be included in CTV.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "need to be included", ensure the context clearly indicates what requires inclusion and why it is necessary. Clarity prevents ambiguity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid overusing "need to be included" in passive voice constructions where an active voice would be more direct and engaging. For instance, instead of "The report needs to be included", try "Include the report."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "need to be included" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating that something requires incorporation as stated by Ludwig. It highlights the necessity of including something to achieve a desired outcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

32%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "need to be included" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to convey the necessity of incorporating something. As indicated by Ludwig, it functions as a modal passive construction and serves to highlight requirements across various domains such as science, news, and business. While highly versatile, writers should avoid overuse in passive constructions and ensure clarity in specifying what necessitates inclusion. Alternatives like "should be incorporated" and "must be integrated" can add nuance to the message, as they suggest levels of obligation and integration respectively.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "need to be included" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "should be incorporated" or "must be integrated", depending on the degree of necessity.

What's the difference between "need to be included" and "should be included"?

"Need to be included" implies a stronger requirement or necessity, whereas "should be included" suggests a recommendation or advisability.

Is it grammatically correct to say "needs to be include" instead of "need to be included"?

No, "needs to be include" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "need to be included", using the base form of the verb after "to be".

In what situations is it most appropriate to use "need to be included"?

It's most appropriate when emphasizing the necessity of including something for completeness, accuracy, or compliance, particularly in formal or technical contexts.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: