We need meta-concepts that transcend limitations of both common words and Boolean numbers.
Such an agent needs meta-cognition in terms of both self-awareness and control.
Where needed, meta-analyses will be performed to aggregate available literature data.
As search engines improved and became more sophisticated, the need for meta search dramatically declined.
We need a meta-law that tells what the law of composition contributes to the actual behavior.
Laws of composition may also pose a problem for dispositional monists like Bird (2007) or Mumford (2004) because, if they are taken to attribute dispositions to systems, we need a meta-law that tells us what happens if the disposition for the law of composition fails to be manifest.
This interpretation has been criticized, as the increased searching in case of ignorance about the hiding place could be explained alternatively by an internal state of uncertainty, without any need for meta-knowledge [18].
Suppose we need to meta-analyse several studies with the risk ratio as the effect measure.
Such inconsistencies in the existing literature support the need for meta-analysis.
This indicates that there is a need for meta-analytical methods via direct and indirect comparisons.
All these aforementioned factors make data interpretation difficult, reinforcing the need for meta-analytic studies in this area using homogeneous morphometric methodologies and including multiple samples of patients.
