Suggestions(1)
Exact(8)
So they need a missile shield instead.
And we "need" a missile defense system.
And if it's even a 10th true, we need a missile strike on BBC HQ, instanter.
they don't need a missile to hit us; they can fire a nuclear mortar from a rowboat off Manhattan.
Someone looking to launch an EMP attack would also need a missile to take the bomb high enough, to a precise point where it could be ensured that the pulse would reach its target.
It is based on flimsy or dishonest arguments, including: (1) We need a missile shield because the cold war deterrence doctrine of MAD, mutual assured destruction, is out of date.
Similar(48)
America needs a missile defense, some say, because of countries like North Korea.
During his presidential campaign, Mr. Bush often cited the possibility of an attack by North Korea as a reason that the United States needed a missile defense system.
At first there was considerable debate in Israel as to whether it really needed a missile shield, a dispute that was essentially ended during the gulf war when 39 Iraqi Scud missiles struck Israeli territory.
But it's still just one initial step in the direction of a nuclear tipped missile, and they still need a reliable missile to deliver the warhead.
What was new this season was that the series, shown on the Fox network, made a second propaganda point: demonstrating that we desperately need a "Star Wars" missile defense system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com