Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Holmes argued in his canonical dissent in Lochner v. New York (1905) that courts should not overturn legislation "unless it can be said that a rational and fair man necessarily would admit that the statute proposed would infringe fundamental principles as they have been understood by the traditions of our people and our law".
Similar(59)
Now if only he would admit it.
No one would admit this problem".
"McLaren would admit that.
Even our rivals would admit "a lot".
Scottish universities would admit women from 1892.
No one would admit anything.
Not that she'd admit it.
Who'd admit it anyway?
Whereas the high-schoolers of my era wouldn't admit to liking show tunes for fear of seeming gay, those of today wouldn't even necessarily conflate the two things, and besides, what's wrong with being gay?
He would never admit this.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com