Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Necessarily there are losses and some characters are reduced to cameos, but lovers of the novel should not be disappointed.
When ◊ is epistemic possibility, and the knowability principle is treated as a necessary thesis that is known, the knowability principle entails that, necessarily, there are no undecided statements.
This returns us to the problem noted in the previous paragraph: it again would turn out that necessarily there are propositions (even in mindless worlds).
These reasons for rejecting this move are the same sorts of reasons that Brock (1993, pp. 149-150) outlines for not arbitrarily ruling "Necessarily there are many worlds" out of consideration by a fictionalist theory.
Therefore, it follows in this case that necessarily there are several possible worlds, and so since (necessarily P) implies P, there in fact exist several possible worlds, which is not something the fictionalist should countenance.
For (11f) is the appropriate correlate of the claim that "necessarily, there are not κ non-overlapping physical objects", and this claim is standardly taken to be equivalent to (11).
Similar(50)
However, the decomposed bases could be shared between classes, and it is not always possible to identify class-specific TF bases as not necessarily there is a unique relationship between the decomposed bases and class labels.
No, not necessarily; there's a long way to go to prove that.
"I like games because the wins aren't clean, necessarily — there's more than one way to do it," she said.
People weren't sure they liked the values, necessarily — there were signs that Abbott wanted to move the party more to the right than Australians had historically been comfortable with — but they were, at the very least, there.
Not that Poulter is in it for the fame: he says he chooses projects solely on the quality of the script: "Hollywood has never been a goal, necessarily – there was no 'Conquer America' game plan for me".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com