Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Mice exposed to nebulized water and sentinel mice served as controls.
The provocative cumulated dose of delivered cold nebulized water producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 UNCDW) was calculated by linear interpolation on the dose-response curve.
The cumulated dose of delivered nebulized water producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 UNDW) was calculated by linear interpolation on the dose-response curve.
Similar(57)
Inhalation of a nebulized water-soluble NO donor (DS1) was assessed in a sheep model of endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the laboratory of Dr Bjertnaes of the University of Tromso, Norway.
The study protocol consisted of inhalation challenges with ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, methacholine, and ultrasonically nebulized cold water.
The purpose of the current investigation was to investigate and compare the responses to inhaled methacholine, ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, and ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water in mustard gas-induced asthma.
Pulmonary function tests and inhalation challenges with ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW), methacholine, and ultrasonically nebulized cold water (UNDCW) were performed on all patients and subjects.
Normal subjects and patients were randomly assigned to start with either ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, methacholine, or ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water.
Six mustard gas-induced asthmatic veterans did not sustain a 20% in FEV1 after ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (33.3%), and two of them (11.11%) did not with ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water; all did with methacholine.
The method of this challenge test was similar to provocation with ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, as previously described.
Sixteen patients were sensitive to the UNDCW challenge test, but only 12 patients responded to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com