Sentence examples for natural supposition from inspiring English sources

Natural supposition was the term's natural or nomic extension, accidental supposition that range of things it supposited for in a particular proposition.

This inconsistency runs throughout Peter's account of supposition, and comes to the fore most prominently in what he says about natural supposition (suppositio naturalis).

This agrees with the natural supposition that, for an approximation technique to be applicable, the domain where the Lipschitz condition is assumed should be wide enough.

From this perspective, the contrast found in thirteenth century authors between (as Peter of Spain called it) natural supposition (William of Sherwood calls it habitual supposition, the Tractatus de proprietatibus sermonum, absolute supposition) versus accidental supposition, becomes less important.

Distinct from these were what Peter of Spain called natural supposition, mentioned earlier in the discussion of signification, and what Ockham and others call improper supposition, covering metaphor and other figures of speech.

The main problem is in what way the property of natural supposition is related to the term's significatio, which was defined as the acceptance of a word for a thing (res).

*** Looked at one way, this colloquy is an occasion for national shame, albeit with a whiff of the risible: here is our country's leader, the champion-in-chief of educational standards, blandly equating natural science and supernatural supposition as "different schools of thought".

This natural history study supports the supposition that treatment may be unnecessary in infant hips with instability with stress and reduced at rest (with or without acetabular dysplasia on sonography measured as percent of head coverage or acetabular bone inclination as with the Graf α angle).

□. Remark 4.1 It is worth noting that due to the results of Manfredi (see [37]), the assumptions of Proposition 4.2 appears natural and it is not a restrictive supposition in practice.

It seems simple enough, but it's all based on an underlying supposition: the cycles of the natural world won't change.

Thus, suppositions such as Newton's that the natural world can be described with reference to inelastic, invisible, extended atoms must be suppositions not about ground floor metaphysics but about the derivative physical world which is merely phenomenal in a broadly Leibnizian sense.