The natural resources extractive sector, owing to its capital-intensity and limited mobility of invested assets, is the haven where foreign officials in emerging markets have the greatest leverage to extract bribes.
The Inland Empire was heavily dependent on natural resources and extractive goods produced from mines, forests, and farms, which experienced a fall in demand.
Informally, however, quite the opposite might happen: Neoliberal privatization and deregulation will further weaken state actors and their capacities, while at the same time strongly and quickly incentivizing the increase in extractive natural resource production, as observed with increased timber harvests and exports.
This implies reaching existing, as well as anticipated regulations and targets for natural resource management, in particular in extractive industries (e.g. mining, forestry, etc).
These findings reinforce what we already know about President Trump's antagonism toward environmental regulation and the energy transition, and his avid support for extractive industries and natural resource management that turns a blind eye to climate change and other environmental impacts.
The economic benefits of natural resource exploitation through carbon intensive and extractive industries like timber, mining, and oil and gas have always been well understood.
Conservationists have suggested that sacred sites are akin to protected areas and represent a form of informal institution for natural resource governance that may incorporate non-extractive norms and active protection and management by local custodians (Wild and McLeod 2008).
This frames medical genetics as an extractive industry that mines a natural resource to produce valuable goods and services.
Her expertise spans international economic law, sustainable development, social impact investing, extractive industries, global economic policy, property and natural resource rights, inequality, social accountability and legal empowerment, and human rights.
By accepting this fact, the Supreme Court positioned medical genetics under the framework of natural resource law and, in effect, recast medical genetics as an extractive, rather than inventive, industry.
