Exact(3)
Genre of the books gives a natural categorization, and the categories are used as class labels in our experiment.
Whereas concepts have only one place in the natural categorization classification, they can be simultaneously part of a number of ad hoc categories.
Our idea was to shape FL to the natural categorization into three zones, as our everyday vocabulary does.
Similar(57)
(b) Instantaneous natural image categorization: the task required the observer to categorize photographs of natural scenes (3°×3° size) by answering whether or not they contained animals.
Genre of the movies gives a natural class categorization, and the categories are used as class labels.
The stimulus photographs used in the instantaneous natural image categorization task were complex color scenes taken from a commercially available CD-ROM library.
For the six subjects we have tested, the SOA for the natural image categorization task ranged from 70 to 110 ms, with a mean of 98 ms for the sample of subjects (Table 1).
On the other hand, comparing with the study of Thorpe et al. [6], the frontal negativity related to the complex natural image categorization task is considerably longer than the SOA we observed using similar tasks.
The results of the six subjects illustrate that, without exploratory eye movements, the FA for natural image categorization covers a 20° height ×24° width visual field (centered at the fixation point); no hemispheric specialization is seen from the shape of FA.
These observations made with a highly sensitive and objective approach open an avenue for clarifying the developmental course of natural image categorization in the human brain.
Indeed, the same advantage for superordinate categories has been found for categorizations of scene contexts -manmade vs. natural- over categorization at the basic level: sea, mountains, indoor, outdoor [40], [41] and contextual categorization might rely on image simple statistics or relatively low resolution sketch [25], [42].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com