Sentence examples for national comparison between from inspiring English sources
The full data now used by the FSA is downloadable, but only on a council-by-council basis, which makes it harder for most users of the site to attempt any kind of national comparison between different brands or areas.
22 For the remainder of the moderate and low-prevalence states, the common constant calibration factor of 0.69 was derived from the NFHS-3 on the basis of the rest of the states (excluding aforesaid six high prevalence states) national comparison between general population prevalence and ANC prevalence.
Purpose / Objective The objectives of the HBSC analysis are to report the prevalence rates of youth health phenomena, to make cross national comparisons between countries, to explore the determinants or factors associated with positive and negative health behaviors and states among young people, and to observe changes and trends over time within and between countries.
Finally, the overall programme theory was intended to provide a broad framework for cross-national comparison between the study countries.
We also recognise the problems of making cross-national comparisons between two very different cultures.
Differences in the absolute risk of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality between the fast-track cohort and the national comparison cohort were tested with chi-square test.
Similar patterns, showing wide variations in both process and result measures between different Swedish counties, have been found in national comparison of preventive work and healthcare [ 24].
Russian national comparison groups are not available.
This would enable further comparison between adolescents' and adults' cancer awareness and cross-national comparison of adolescents' cancer awareness.
Indicators at the national level allow the comparison between countries, and indicators at the provincial, state, or county level allow comparison of subnational areas according to data availability.
In general, S. aureus was described as an important etiological agent; however, the difference in design of national studies makes a comparison between the prevalence of bone infection, the associated risk factors, and the different therapeutic approaches difficult.
