Blueprint for Revolution echoes a lot of the advocacy techniques I talk about on my blog – power analysis, quick wins, clear narratives, identify champions, allies, blockers and the undecided.
A recent qualitative study of CHW narratives identified social justice as the driving force in what was meaningful to CHWs (Murray and Zeigler 2015).
As frames profoundly influence behaviours, we suggest using the frames and narratives identified in the research to develop interventions that enable biodiversity outcomes from the regrowth.
An analysis of these narratives identified eight place meanings (accessibility, site attributes, variety, social interactions, mecca, learning, exploration, and escape) which were grouped into three dimensions (physical site, social, and experiential).
Both the survey data and patient narratives identified some similar issues about patients' experiences.
Whilst there were several character-driven stories told during the lectures, they only accounted for ten of the forty-eight narratives identified across all three lectures; roughly 20%%.
The possibility of these publications being missed, along with other hard-to-find and grey literature, has implications for the robustness of the narratives identified.
As has been demonstrated in the narratives identified, approaches to quality assurance are linked closely to conceptualisations of quality, about which there is a much larger body of literature than was reviewed for this paper.
Finally, of all the narratives identified, it was the ones categorised as "stories" with a character-driven plot, and some emotional struggle towards achieving a goal, which provoked the most discussion and positive remarks about nearly all the aspects of learning I have highlighted.
The uncertainty narrative identifies biographical uncertainty rather than economic insecurity per se as the major consequence of job instability.
