names of contributors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "names of contributors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to individuals who have contributed to a project, document, or piece of work. Example: "The report includes the names of contributors who helped gather the data and analyze the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

He kept the names of contributors and usually gave receipts for the tickets, which never won.

The New York Times

Lists names of contributors and amounts of contributions to the church.

Cornell University

He said detectives have the names of contributors who paid for the badges, but not their addresses.

The New York Times

In addition to the ban on corporate giving, nearly all Democrats and many Republicans backed a bill to publicize the names of contributors and the extent of their generosity.

The New York Times

On the last page are printed the names of contributors to the forthcoming issue Jean-Jacques Abrahamsms, Pierrette Berthoud, Sylvano Bussotti, William Burroughs – which the woman reads aloud "with a mocking smile".

The Guardian - Books

As has become customary in renovated cultural institutions here, the walls of the museum are now peppered with the names of contributors, in this case most prominently Garry Weston, a Canadian-born British industrialist who gave $28 million, and Walter Annenberg, the former American ambassador to Britain, who gave $10 million.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

But he has refused to disclose the names of the contributors, citing his "word of honor" not to do so.

The New York Times

But Congress recently enacted rules that will require the groups to disclose the names of future contributors.

The New York Times

This chapter lists the names of the contributors of the book named 18th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, such as J. Abonyi, A. Adhitya, O.FBarroso-Muñoz, and many others.

Computer Aided Chemical Engineering

This section of the book presents the names of the contributors who contributed to the book "Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics".

Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics

In both debates, he has challenged Mr Martin to disclose all political contributions he has gathered and the names of the contributors.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "names of contributors", ensure you have explicit permission to share their information, especially in contexts involving donations or sensitive data.

Common error

Avoid using "names of contributors" without clearly specifying the nature of their contribution. Always clarify what the contributors contributed to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "names of contributors" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as a subject or object in a sentence. It identifies a group of individuals who have contributed to something, as demonstrated by Ludwig examples across various domains.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "names of contributors" is a grammatically correct and understandable noun phrase, primarily used to acknowledge and credit individuals who have contributed to various projects or causes. According to Ludwig, it is most commonly found in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While the phrase is typically neutral to formal, it is essential to consider privacy implications when sharing such information. Alternative phrases, such as "list of donors" or "acknowledgment of collaborators", may be more appropriate depending on the specific context. The Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and provides numerous examples of its usage across authoritative sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identification of sponsors

Specifically refers to those providing sponsorship; narrower scope.

roll call of investors

Focuses on financial investment.

list of donors

Focuses specifically on financial contributors; narrower scope.

directory of backers

Implies financial support or endorsement; slightly informal.

roster of participants

Emphasizes involvement, not necessarily monetary contributions; broader scope.

index of subscribers

Specifically refers to those who have subscribed to a service or publication.

registry of benefactors

Highlights those who provided a benefit; often implies generosity.

acknowledgment of collaborators

Highlights collaborative effort; more formal.

compilation of supporters

Emphasizes those who provided backing or advocacy.

credits attribution

Common in creative projects (films, books) indicating who contributed.

FAQs

How do I properly acknowledge "names of contributors" in a research paper?

In academic writing, list "names of contributors" in an acknowledgments section, detailing their specific contributions to the research. Follow citation guidelines like APA or MLA.

Is it necessary to list "names of contributors" for open-source projects?

Yes, it's crucial to list contributors in open-source projects, often in a CONTRIBUTORS.md file or similar. This acknowledges their work and encourages further participation. It's similar to giving "credits attribution".

When is it appropriate to use "list of donors" instead of "names of contributors"?

Use "list of donors" specifically when referring to financial contributors. "Names of contributors" is a broader term encompassing any type of contribution, while "list of donors" is more specific.

How can I ensure privacy when sharing "names of contributors"?

Always obtain consent from contributors before publishing their names. Consider using pseudonyms or anonymizing data if full disclosure is not necessary or permissible. You could also seek legal advice.