Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
N Excess Cases: Instances with excessive CSNT values (>2000 ppm) were in fact known to have excess N or there was no evidence to the contrary (Table 1, Fig 2c).
I.e., infrequent false positives for N excess: When the test indicated excess N, it was generally correct.
The extended networks of canals and ditches in agricultural landscapes provide high buffer capacity towards nitrogen (N) excess.
In many cases with excess N rates the CSNT did not show high values (>2000 ppm).e., frequent false negatives for N excess: The tool often did not identify excesses when fertilizer N levels were in fact excessive.
Wetlands are highly effective systems mitigating the negative effects of N excess, but at the same time they contribute to global warming through greenhouse gas emissions.
Higher microbial N excess in mineral horizons might also indicate higher N availability for plants.
Similar(51)
For accurately detecting N excesses, earlier research from New York suggests that fields with excessive N applications may still show low or optimum CSNT values (What's Cropping UP? Vol.21 No.3) and that site differences affect CSNT values more than excess or deficient fertilizer rates (Katsvairo et al., 2003).
The increase in the yield of milk N with excess RUP was not influenced by parity, but multiparous cows retained more of the additional N apparently absorbed, whereas primiparous cows excreted the additional apparently absorbed N in the urine.
However, with even a mere 1.5 fold increases in endogenous N expression excess N signaling becomes apparent [11], [12], [14], [15].
Stored nitrate in plant tissues demonstrates a capacity to acquire N in excess of assimilation rates and the critical content of reduced N required for maximal growth.
Approximately one-third of the simulated data sets produced MLEs of N in excess of 100 million when the standard diffusion approximation was employed with s = 0.5 (see Figure 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com