The location of myopic CNV, which was classified into subfoveal, juxtafoveal, or extrafoveal one, was determined using both FA and fundus photography (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan).
Note that for solving the model in a myopic fashion the static location problem has been solved independently for each time interval, taking into account the prevailing travel times respectively.
Table 3 compares the solutions obtained when solving the location problem in a myopic fashion, compared to the solution of the mDSM.
Using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), the macular choroidal thickness of high myopic eyes and normal control eyes were measured and compared at each location.
Myopic CNV has typical characteristics including small size, more often subfoveal or juxtafoveal location, absence or minimal presence of subretinal fluid, and hemorrhage in the background of tigroid fundus appearance.
The high myopic eyes had a thinner choroid than the control eyes at all macular locations (all P < 0.001).
The CTh, VD, and R values have not shown statistically significant differences between macular locations in group 2, which may indicate a more homogeneous thickness across myopic retinal subfields (Tables 3 and 4).
First the solution quality of the location patterns lp t1) (lprevailingvatling at1t1 (t2) will be evaluated and compared to the solution of the myopic problem lp M (t1) (lp M (t2)).
In the case of a small Hamming distance between the two location patterns lp t1) and lp t2), the pattern which currently performs worse (lp(t−)) relative to its corresponding myopic solution will be assimilated to the location pattern of the myopic solution (lp M (t−)) prevailing at time t−.
Machado is mildly myopic.
