Sentence examples for mutual information decoder from inspiring English sources

Exact(5)

This universal decoder is shown to be closely related to the Lagrange-optimized decoder of Oosterwijk et al. and the empirical mutual information decoder of Moulin.

In between, Section 3.4 discusses a completely different approach to obtain a universal simple decoder (based on the empirical mutual information decoder of Moulin [25]) and shows how in the end the result is again quite similar.

We also showed how the proposed universal decoder is very similar to both Oosterwijk et al.'s decoder h and an approximation of Moulin's empirical mutual information decoder m for 0≪p≪1 by begin{array}{*{20}l} c cdot g x,y,p) sim h x,y,p) sim n cdot m x,y,p), end{array}.

To construct this decoder, we start with the empirical mutual information decoder previously proposed by Moulin [25], and for now, let us assume p i ≡p is fixed.4 With this decoder, a user is assigned a score of the form begin{array}{*{20}l} S_{j} &= sum_{x,y} hat{f}_{X,Y|P} x,y|p) lnleft(frac{hat{f}_{X,Y|P} x,y|p)}{hat{f}_{X|P}(x|p)hat{f}_{Y|P} y|p)}right) end{array}.

For the interleaving attack strategy, the Bayesian approximation of the empirical mutual information decoder of (11) satisfies begin{array}{*{20}l} m x,y,p) = left{begin{array}{cc} lnleft(1 + frac{p}{n(1 - p)}right) & text{if}~ x = y = 0; !!!!!!!!!!!!!lnleft(1 - frac{1}{n}right) & !!!!!!!!!!!!text{if}~ x neq y; !!!!!!lnleft(1 + frac{1 - p}{np}right) & text{if}~ x = y = 1.

Similar(55)

Assuming an MMSE decoder, the mutual information between the k th transmitter and its intended receiver k can be expressed as [11] R k ( w ) = log 2 I N + p ∑ j H kj W V j V j H W H H kj H I N + p ∑ j ≠ k H kj W V j V j H W H H kj H, (9).

In the cases of MMSE-IC and MMSE-IC1 (Figure 6c and Figure 6d, respectively), the characteristics present a lower mutual information than the LC-K-Best decoder when I A1<0.85.

Given a code, the EXIT function associated is defined by the relation between the a priori mutual information at the input of the decoder (commonly denoted as I a ) and the corresponding extrinsic mutual information I e at its output, i.e., I e =T(I a ).

In this case, Corollary 1 of [20] shows that G i, OPT is the optimum decoder and the mutual information I Ei in (8) becomes I Ei = log 2 σ s j 2 C ij F j F j * C ij * + Φ n i Φ n i, i, j = 1, 2 and i ≠ j. (10).

Compute the extrinsic information from the channel decoder, i.e., mutual information I E or (text {MMSE}_{text {ext}}^{B}) based on the PDF of L E (L A (y π,t,S π,t ),y ′(t)),e ′(t)).

LC-K-Best decoder has slightly less mutual information than STS-SD.

Show more...

Your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: