"mutual concessions" is correct and usable in written English.
It is a phrase used to describe when two or more sides or parties have agreed to give up something in order to reach an agreement that each party can accept. Example: The two countries were able to reach a peaceful resolution by making mutual concessions.
His solution was dialogue and mutual concessions.
In the end a secret deal and mutual concessions resolved the crisis.
The sequencing of mutual concessions would be subject of delicate negotiations as would be their irreversibility.
Only a negotiated settlement that addresses both sides' vital interests, based on mutual concessions, has a chance of achieving an enduring peace.
This matchup does not augur well for the new Middle East peace process, begun last week when American officials published a seven-page road map of proposed mutual concessions.
The new president had a plan for mutual concessions: application of the long-promised ("roadmap") freeze on Israeli settlement construction on Palestine land, and a fresh Palestine start on security negotiations.
The large variety of diverse and competing interests subject to Federal control, persistently seeking the recognition of their claims, need give us no fear that "the greatest good to the greatest number" will fail to be accomplished if in the halls of national legislation that spirit of amity and mutual concession shall prevail in which the Constitution had its birth.
By the Father of his Country our Constitution was commended for adoption as "the result of a spirit of amity and mutual concession". In that same spirit it should be administered, in order to promote the lasting welfare of the country and to secure the full measure of its priceless benefits to us and to those who will succeed to the blessings of our national life.
Compromise, noun: a middle state between conflicting opinions or actions reached by mutual concession or modification.
With a building of mutual trust, concessions from both sides, international support and economic incentives, it is certainly possible to finally resolve the conflict for good.
As in 1978 and 1993, balanced mediation can induce mutual and voluntary concessions so that both sides, living in peace, can claim credit for victory.
