mutual clashes

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mutual clashes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe conflicts or disagreements that occur between two or more parties that are equally involved. Example: "The mutual clashes between the two departments have led to a breakdown in communication and collaboration."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The mutual antipathies and clashing interests of the Americans, their differences of governments, habitudes, and manners, indicate that they will have no centre of union and no common interest.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The danger of armed clashes across mutual borders is rising too.

The Guardian - Opinion

The mutual warnings also represented a clash of nerves between the young North Korean leader, who is building his credentials as head of his militaristic country, and Park Geun-hye, South Korea's first female president, who has stressed security as her top priority.

The New York Times

It wasn't a mutual split or a major clash of personalities.

TechCrunch

Although there were later tensions between Scott and Shackleton, when their polar ambitions directly clashed, in public mutual civilities were preserved; Scott joined in the official receptions that greeted Shackleton on his return in 1909 after the Nimrod Expedition, and the two were exchanging polite letters about their respective ambitions in 1909 10.

Wikipedia

President Horta: What happened was that too soon after our independence, personalities clash and visions overlap, mutual suspicions intervene, and leaders were not able to work together to address the simmering tensions in the country.

Huffington Post

That great day includes two other clashes between nations with a mutual history: Russia versus the Czech Republic to start the tripleheader at Canada Hockey Place, and Sweden versus Finland to end it.

The New York Times

Business bosses often clash with politicians, but today's gulf of mutual distrust is unusually wide.

The Economist

And all the talk that has preceded this scene -- about the Dionysian spirit and the Oedipal clash of artistic generations -- and the implicit mutual resentment and fascination that has been festering between the men find a pulse-quickening, visceral outlet.

The New York Times

In a speech to the gathering, Mr. Zapatero said the alliance hoped to prevent a "clash of civilizations, by promoting security, understanding tolerance and mutual respect".

The New York Times

Mother Jones reported that all nine of the mutual funds Hobby Lobby's retirement plan holds include investments that clash with the owners' religious beliefs about abortion.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "mutual clashes", ensure the context clearly indicates that the conflicts are indeed reciprocal and affect all parties involved. Avoid using it when the conflict is one-sided or disproportionately impacts one party.

Common error

A common mistake is using "mutual clashes" to describe situations where one party is primarily responsible for the conflict or suffers the most consequences. Ensure that all parties are actively involved and affected by the conflict to justify the use of "mutual clashes".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mutual clashes" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. It denotes the existence of conflicts that are shared or reciprocal in nature. Based on Ludwig's assessment, the phrase is grammatically correct and understandable.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "mutual clashes" is a grammatically correct noun phrase used to describe reciprocal conflicts between multiple parties. Though assessed by Ludwig AI as usable, it currently lacks substantial real-world examples. When using the phrase, ensure that the context clearly emphasizes the shared nature of the conflict. Alternatives such as "reciprocal conflicts" or "joint disputes" might be suitable depending on the desired level of formality. Avoid using it in situations where the conflict is primarily one-sided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reciprocal conflicts

Focuses on the give-and-take aspect of conflict, where each side's actions affect the other.

shared disagreements

Highlights the commonality of differing opinions between parties.

joint disputes

Emphasizes the legal or formal nature of the disagreements.

common antagonisms

Suggests a deeper, more inherent sense of opposition or hostility.

bilateral conflicts

Specifies that the conflict is between two parties.

interlocking disagreements

Implies that the disagreements are complex and interconnected.

concerted opposition

Indicates a deliberate and organized form of resistance.

coordinated resistance

Similar to concerted opposition but highlights the aspect of synchronized action.

collaborative friction

Suggests that the conflict arises from a collaborative effort.

interdependent clashes

Highlights that the parties are reliant on each other, yet still in conflict.

FAQs

How can I use "mutual clashes" in a sentence?

To use "mutual clashes" effectively, ensure your sentence clearly indicates that the conflicts are reciprocal and involve all parties equally. For example, "The "mutual disagreements" between the departments led to decreased productivity".

What's the difference between "mutual clashes" and "one-sided conflict"?

"Mutual clashes" describes a situation where all parties are actively involved in and affected by the conflict, whereas "one-sided conflict" implies that one party is primarily responsible for the conflict or suffers most of its consequences.

Are there more formal alternatives to "mutual clashes"?

Yes, more formal alternatives include "bilateral conflicts", "joint disputes", or "reciprocal conflicts", which might be more appropriate in academic or professional settings.

When is it inappropriate to use the phrase "mutual clashes"?

It's inappropriate to use "mutual clashes" when the conflict is largely the result of one party's actions, or when the consequences are disproportionately borne by one side. Ensure that the conflict is genuinely reciprocal before using this phrase.