Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(22)
Among all somatically mutated genes, CREBBP mutations were most significantly enriched within the earliest inferable progenitor.
KRAS mutations were most frequent and identified in 132 (42%) tumors, followed by APC in 79 (25%) and TP53 in 64 (21%) tumors.
Mutations were most commonly found in gastrointestinal samples with 12 of 119 (10%) colorectal and 10 of 100 (10%) gastric neoplasms, respectively, harboring changes.
Low-abundance PI mutations were most commonly seen, occurring in 18 of 22 subjects (82%); however the majority was "minor" IAS-USA PI mutations [23].
The percentage of sequences having a drug resistance mutation is shown in Figure 2. NRTI resistance associated mutations were most frequently found with a prevalence of 62% [13].
Mutations were most prominent in the DNA binding domain, encoded by exons 5 8, and only about five percent of the mutations were observed in exon 4 and exon 11.
Similar(38)
Nonsense and frameshift mutations are most common and are associated with severe disease.
The population that carried < 1250 mutations was most often placed in the range of normal proliferation (healthy old SCCs, n = 9), while the majority of SCCs carrying > 1250 mutations showed abnormally long times in culture (diseased old SCCs, n = 7).
Some scientists have criticized TCGA for focusing on gene sequencing while diverting funds from functional studies that can determine which of the hundreds of mutations are most important.
Further sequencing efforts revealed that mutations are most prevalent in WHO grade II/III gliomas (71%) and secondary GBMs (88%) but less common in primary GBMs (7%) (Balss et al., 2008).
The perceivable differences between the control and experimental groups, inclusion of content addressing timelines, sizes of beaks, and mutations, is most likely attributed to the divergent interaction with the situations of chance tutorial by the groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com