Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In most internal cancers, not strongly linked to tobacco consumption, such as brain, colorectal, and breast cancers, the frequency of G to T mutations is between 8 and 10 per cent (Figure 2).
22 The estimated rate of APC new mutations is between 4 and 9×10 mutations/gametes/generation, 23 and equal susceptibility for mutagenesis during spermatogenesis and oogenesis has been described.
Similar(58)
Previously, it was felt that the risk for desmoids tumors was most severe in patients with FAP whose mutations were between codons 1444 and 1578 [ 12].
The frequency of KRAS mutations was between 0 and 9% in several phase II trials of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in advanced gastric or OGJ adenocarcinoma [ 9- 11, 25].
The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in patients with a BRCA1 mutation is between 40 and 60%% [ 1, 3] compared with the general population risk of 1.8 % [ 4].
Hopwood et al. (1985) showed that mutation frequency is higher when the survival rates from UV mutation are between 10 and 0.1%%.Since the aim of this work was to increase the innate capability of the strain to secrete/produce more cellulases, 2-DG, an antimetabolite, was used to screen for catabolite repression-resistant mutants (Montenecourt and Eveleigh 1975).
These genetic changes can persist throughout bacterial strains when the genetic code for these mutations is spread between them.
These results reveal that the frequency of EMS-induced transition and transversion mutations is comparable between different individual mutants that were derived from the same mutagenized population.
Our results suggest that the accumulation and/or segregation of deleterious mutations is different between the two selfing genotypes of E. paniculata.
The risk of inducing new YIDD mutations is theoretically equal between LdT + ADV and LAM + ADV therapy.
The prevalence of such mutations is highly variable between cancer (sub types [ 2, 22 ].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com