Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(41)
But most mutations are neutral in their effect.Sexual reproduction mixes up the DNA, distributing neutral mutations around the population.
Most of the spontaneous mutations are neutral or deleterious, while disadvantage mutations will be discarded, and neutral mutations can still retain.
The vast majority of DNA-changes (mutations) are neutral from the point of view of fitness, and therefore tend to accumulate over time.
Although it is known that many mutations are neutral, or almost neutral, with a very small effect on fitness (Futuyma 2009), in this teaching resource, we only considered influential genes (e.g., the HOX gene) affecting body plans of the embryo.
Most new mutations are neutral with respect to survival and reproduction and therefore are irrelevant in terms of natural selection (but not, it must be pointed out, to evolution more broadly).
"Normal" users may not even know that the software they are using is different from the software used by the person in the neighboring cubicle because the mutations are neutral with respect to the standard program behavior.
Similar(19)
The cumulative effect of mutations is neutral and not transformative in vast majority of normal cells since the mutational effect follows a Gaussian distribution as proposed by our model.
A large amount of mutations is neutral: 53.07%.
Mutation DFE was always centered on zero, with the majority of mutations being neutral.
If all mutations were neutral they would be accepted and ω would be 1.
Mutations arose at rate μ = 2.3 × 10 − 8 per site per generation, and all mutations were neutral with respect to fitness.
More suggestions(15)
mutants are neutral
mutations are unbiased
mutations are silent
mutations are deleterious
mutations are irrelevant
mutations are accidental
mutations are frequent
mutations are necessary
mutations are rare
mutations are unknown
mutations are heterozygous
mutations are unique
mutations are present
mutations are predictive
mutations are beneficial
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com