Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
> Table 9 shows the mutation extraction results at each threshold.
Similar(59)
The result on mutation extraction shows that performance is quite high using partial matching, with a result over 85 in F1 measure by SETH.
We have proposed combining multiple mutation extraction tools together by merging their results, and have shown that their combination results in substantially improved recall of mutations with minimal impact on precision, providing evidence of the complementary nature of the tools.
Results on the mutation extraction are available in Table 8 for the COSMIC database and in Table 9 for the InSiGHT database.
These results show that mutation extraction tools that were developed based on MEDLINE abstracts, once applied to narrative literature still have high precision, and that their combination provides a high precision and recall solution.
The downloaded abstracts were then further filtered to include only those in which the EMU mutation extraction tool identified at least one mutation mention, resulting in a corpus of 810 abstracts.
As above, coverage of mutation extraction was evaluated by matching the triples (PMID, gene, mutation) extracted by EMU with the curated mutations in COSMIC and InSiGHT.
The tables show results for different representations of the articles and different mutation extraction tools used.
The results in the tables show the complementarity of the mutation extraction tools.
There are mutations not extracted by EMU that have been found by other mutation extraction methods.
The road extraction results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com