Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Our findings demonstrated that the N996I KCNH2 mutation caused a similar (∼30 40%) IKr reduction in both mutated hiPSC- and hESC-derived CMs.
The Y26A mutation caused a moderate loss of activity.
Differential scanning calorimetry experiments revealed that the mutation caused a modest increase in thermodynamic stability of the Fab, a feature predicted by the computational model.
Thus, the F327A mutation caused a loss of catalytic function by distorting the abovementioned elements.
This mutation caused a 60% reduction in crosslinking, comparable in magnitude to its effect on the permanganate sensitivity of T+2 (Figure 2B).
Thus, the Q453E mutation caused a loss of about 50- and 5-folds of enzymatic efficacy, kcat/KM, for cGMP and cAMP, respectively.
These data demonstrated that Cx30 null mutation caused a deficit in GJ-mediated metabolite transfer among cells in the sensory epithelium of the cochlea.
The absence of a C4BP effect in cells from patients with CD40 mutations is more difficult to reconcile with our data, although it is possible that the mutation caused a more generalised defect rendering cells unresponsive to TNFr mediated stimuli.
While the E108K and E111K mutants enabled the interaction with the complex, although diminished, the D124K mutation caused a drastic decrease in the interaction with ISCU and NFS1 (Fig 3A).
The sst2Δ mutation caused a saturation of active G-proteins so that the internal gradient was too shallow (G-proteins were almost fully active at both front and back) to be amplified by the downstream mechanisms.
Expression of the Glu379 insertion mutation caused a significant reduction in the total number of amperometric spikes per stimulus in comparison to controls in a direct comparison of responding cells (Figure 3B); however, it should be noted that this effect is likely underrepresented as the majority of Glu379 expressing cells produced no amperometric response.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com