Sentence examples for mutants when compared from inspiring English sources

Quantification of transcripts shows a significant increase in ezh2 mRNA abundance in MZezh1ul3/ul3 mutants when compared to wild-type at 2-, 3-, 4- and 5 dpf (Fig. 6B).

The cells were stacked closer in the mutants when compared to the WT and the C4 lines.

Absence of differences in vacuolar invertase activity between the WT and mutant could be attributed to functional redundancy exhibited by OsINV2, the transcript levels of which were significantly higher in the mutants when compared to the WT (Additional file 1: Figure S5D).

These results suggested that although patterning is similar, cell shapes and asymmetry of markers appeared more disrupted in the armF1a, GSK3 double mutants when compared to armF1a alone.

rict-1 mutants when compared to wild type, exhibit similar levels of the CARS signal and a two-fold increase in the autofluorescent signal.

Nevertheless, a significant level of spontaneous reversals remains in these mutants when compared to animals that lack glr-1 receptors (Fig. S4B).

However, relative efficiency of secretion was different among the mutants when comparing the amounts of Scr3 between the TCLs and exosomes.

No change in the bacterial lifecycle was observed for this mutant when compared to its parental WT strain (Fig. 4b).

The length, width and area of filled grains were all significantly smaller for the mutant when compared to the WT (Fig. 4b).

Grain length and width of unhulled grain was also smaller in the mutant when compared with the WT, with significant recovery observed for both the traits in C4 (Fig. 1g).

Of the three rice PRXs (OsPrxIIE2, Os2-CysPrxA, and OsPrxQ) that show leaf/shoot-preferential expression, both OsPrxIIE2 and OsPrxQ were significantly down-regulated in the dxr mutant when compared with the wild type (WT).