mutants developed in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mutants developed in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the origin or creation of mutants, often in scientific or fictional narratives. Example: "The research team focused on mutants developed in controlled laboratory conditions to study their genetic variations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

These conditional mutants developed progressive deficits in motor function that are accompanied by the accumulation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in neurons.

Cell Death and Differentiation

novicida type strain U112, the F. novicida transposon two-allele mutant library [2], the restriction-deficient strain MFN245 [44], and the deletion mutant strains developed in this paper are stored at −80°C in tryptic soy broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) plus 0.1% cysteine (TSBC) plus 10% DMSO.

Plosone

We found that the mutant strains developed in suspension with added cAMP expressed the pulse-induced and early adenylyl cyclase (ACA -dependent genes, but not the lACA -dependentdent, post-agenesation genes.

Developmental Biology

To test this hypothesis, we examined whether inclusion bodies containing mutant SOD1 developed in L84V SOD1-expressing cells subjected to ER stress.

Plosone

The mutant strains developed in a timely manner in shaken suspension under starvation conditions as well as on phosphate agar plates and formed normal fruiting bodies (data not shown).

Plosone

To specifically perturb Vinculin's role at FAJs, we used the α-catenin-ΔVBS mutant recently developed in our lab.

Biology Open

One hundred percent mutant virus developed in patients 5 7; these patients shed influenza virus for 65 , 75 and 12 days, respectively.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The Δ cpaAIR mutant strain developed in this study does not harbor plasmids nor antibiotic resistance markers, as it was constructed without the use of a RAM-containing intron, and should prove advantageous for future genetic and metabolic engineering efforts by abolishing the requirement for M. FnuDII methylation of shuttle vectors prior to electrotransformation.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

As neither rse nor kar mutants develop pigmentation defects in larvae, we investigated the role of endothelins in larval pigmentation.

Biology Open

For example, crb mutants develop fragmented junctions, in which aPKC and BazWT GFP colocalize.

Cell

Interestingly, while Syt VII mutant mice develop a mild, self-limiting inflammatory response involving muscle, FoxP3/Syt VII double mutants develop a significant inflammatory response in muscle, histologically resembling polymyositis in humans.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the creation of mutants, specify the environment or method used for their development to provide clarity and context. For example, use "mutants developed in response to radiation" instead of just "mutants developed".

Common error

Avoid using "mutants developed in" without specifying the context or conditions. Provide specific details about where or how the mutants were developed to avoid ambiguity and enhance the clarity of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mutants developed in" functions as a descriptive element, often acting as an adjectival modifier to specify the context or environment in which the mutants originated or were cultivated. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "mutants developed in" is a grammatically correct phrase primarily used in scientific contexts to specify the conditions or environment in which mutant organisms are created or evolved. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is usable in written English. Given its scientific nature, the register is formal. While various alternative phrases exist, such as ""mutants generated within"" and ""mutants produced in"", it's important to provide specific details about the development environment to avoid ambiguity and enhance clarity. Specifying the environment helps contextualize the findings and communicate effectively within the scientific community. Despite a lack of examples, remember the guidance to avoid overgeneralization and always define the context for the reader.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mutants produced in

Similar to 'developed in', but emphasizes the act of production or creation.

mutant lines developed in

Highlights the development of mutant lineages within a particular study or research.

mutant strains generated in

Focuses on the generation of specific mutant strains within a defined environment.

mutants generated within

Focuses on the creation or generation of mutants in a particular setting, emphasizing the process.

engineered mutants developed in

Emphasizes the deliberate engineering and subsequent development of mutants in a specific environment.

mutants cultivated within

Highlights the controlled growth and development of mutants in a specific environment.

mutants arising within

Emphasizes the spontaneous emergence or appearance of mutants in a given context.

mutants observed within

Focuses on the observation or detection of mutants in a particular environment.

mutants identified in

Highlights the discovery and identification of mutants within a specific location or sample.

mutants selected in

Emphasizes the process of choosing or isolating specific mutants within a larger population.

FAQs

How can I use "mutants developed in" in a sentence?

You can use "mutants developed in" to describe the environment or method in which mutant organisms were created or evolved. For example, "The study focused on "mutants produced in" a high-radiation environment".

What are some alternatives to "mutants developed in"?

Alternatives include "mutants generated within", "mutants arising within", or "mutants produced in", depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "mutants developed at" instead of "mutants developed in"?

While "mutants developed at" could be used to indicate a specific location (e.g., a laboratory), "mutants developed in" is more commonly used to describe the conditions or environment in which the mutants were created or evolved. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "mutants developed in" and "mutants identified in"?

"Mutants developed in" implies that the mutants were created or evolved within a specific environment or under certain conditions. "Mutants identified in", on the other hand, suggests that the mutants were discovered or detected within a particular sample or location, regardless of where they originated.