Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Other evidence suggesting that ΔF508/ΔNBD2 (Δ1173−1480) was more difficult to rescue was the observation that introduction of V510D into the mutant yielded lower levels of mature protein compared to the ΔF508/ΔNBD2/V510D (Δ1197−1480) construct.
Similar(59)
Infectivity was detected for all viruses (except for V1) at p1, although mutant viruses yielded lower titres and SI values than WT.
However, the present study showed that the supernatants of this mutant yielded significantly lower levels of xylose than a commercial enzyme mixture when pretreated substrates containing high levels of xylan and xylose oligomers were used.
The SpA mutant yielded similar results to the uninfected osteoblasts.
Lower transmission rates usually yield lower BER.
In comparison, the fact that the △3 mutant yields even lower anisotropy levels than the non-cognate RNA suggests that the TC can never bind the △3 IRES ribosome complex even transiently.
Eight of the mutant plasmids yielded significantly lower amounts of protein, five of them expressed less than half of the protein amount compared with wild-type (D125A, N235A, Y236A, W243A and D244A).
While all mutants yielded comparable amounts of protein in inclusion bodies, they gave distinct yields after refolding and purification, respectively maximum for wild type hNGF, hNGFR100K and hNGFR100Q, intermediate for hNGFR100A and hNGFR100E and much lower for the genetic mutant hNGFR100W (or for mutants with hydrophobic residues R100Y, R100I, R100L and R100V consistently) [32].
Three of these mutants yielded high dunce-like optomotor responsiveness.
All single PRF mutants yielded no effects on root development.
Quantification of total (intracellular and extracellular) viral RNA collected from cell cultures transfected with mutant FMDVs yielded 104 105 viral RNA molecules/cell (vRNA/cell) for mutants V3, V15 9 and V19 4, a value which is 10– to 100 fold lower than that obtained for FMDV WT (Figure 2D).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com