Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
For each mutant, we estimate its initial population size c i and the corresponding growth rate r i.
Similar(59)
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the HPLC profile of the wild-type enzyme was obtained with one-tenth the protein concentration of that of the A31Y mutant (we estimated that the A31Y mutant was approximately 2.5-fold less active).
Since many of the cell lines displayed no mutants, we estimated the rate using a single hypothetical mutant.
We use these mutant libraries to generate pools of mutant influenza viruses, which we estimate incorporate at least 85% of the possible HA codon mutations and 97% of the possible amino-acid mutations.
Fitting the data to allow for a two-step process involving UBA dimer dissociation and folding by ubiquitin-binding we estimated that the mutant binds at least 6-fold weaker than the wild-type UBA (wild-type UBA Kd = 19 μM and I424S-UBA Kd = 119 μM).
We estimated that purR mutants are present in the unselected cultures at a mean frequency of 0.35 mutants per culture or ∼2.7 × 10−5/10 cells.
First we estimated the levels of Kelch expression in mutants for cul3.
Based on the enzyme kinetics of the wildtype protein kcat/Km of 332/M/s and that of the mutant protein at roughly 3.5/M/s we can estimate that the mutant protein has a roughly 100-fold decrease in enzymatic activity.
Because we have a set of known regulators from KEGG, we can compare the mutant phenotypes to estimate how likely it is that an unknown gene belongs to the same pathway.
A recent method called FATHMM [ 39] also uses an MSA to identify conserved amino acid residues, but builds an HMM from the MSA and computes the differences in model probabilities between the wild-type and mutant residues to estimate the impact of the substitution.
We retained for this study the single Ara+ mutant whose estimated fitness relative to its source sample was closest to unity (and, in all cases, not significantly different from 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com