must identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "must identified" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a grammatical error, possibly intended to convey a necessity for identification. Example: "All participants must be identified before entering the venue."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Critical Care

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

MUST identified a high, medium, or low risk in respectively 1%, 4% and 95% of subjects.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Must identify the bike or bring lock".

The New York Times

Second, the doctor must identify the disease behind the symptoms.

The New York Times - Magazine

Rather than inflicting more punishment on victims, we must identify and eliminate the bad doctors.

The New York Times

The Giants must identify starters at right tackle and right guard.

The New York Times - Sports

To get it, girls must identify and then fill a need in their community.

The New York Times

"And we must identify and treat children infected over the past decade.

The Guardian

Group 4: You are in a crowd and must identify a stranger.

The New York Times

Learning the Route First, however, you must identify those materials, an initially daunting task for technophobes.

The New York Times

We must identify examples of male violence as just that: male violence against women.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This mapping exercise must identify local users' needs and gaps in current services.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When expressing a requirement for identification, use the passive form "must be identified" or active form "must identify". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "must" directly followed by a past participle like "identified". "Must" requires a base form of the verb (e.g. "identify") or a passive construction with "be" (e.g. "must be identified").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "must identified" attempts to express a necessity or obligation related to the action of identifying. However, it's grammatically flawed. As Ludwig AI points out, the proper construction requires either the base form of the verb after "must" ("must identify") or a passive form ("must be identified").

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "must identified" is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The correct forms are "must identify" or "must be identified", depending on whether you want to use the active or passive voice. While the intended meaning is to express a necessity for identification, using the incorrect phrase undermines clarity and credibility. Remember to use the base form of the verb or the passive construction to ensure grammatical accuracy in your writing. As seen in the provided examples, this phrase is rare and its intended usage is in areas such as "News & Media", "Science" and "Formal & Business".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must be identified

Passive voice construction clarifies that something needs to undergo the process of identification.

needs to identify

Replaces "must" with "needs to" for a slightly less formal tone, while maintaining the core meaning.

is required to identify

Uses a more formal and explicit expression of requirement.

has to identify

A more conversational alternative to "must identify", conveying the same obligation.

should identify

Shifts the emphasis to a recommendation or expectation, rather than a strict obligation.

must determine

Substitutes "identify" with "determine", focusing on the process of finding something out with certainty.

must ascertain

Replaces "identify" with a more formal synonym, "ascertain", which means to find something out for certain.

must pinpoint

Uses "pinpoint" to suggest identifying something with precision and accuracy.

identification is mandatory

Shifts the focus from the action to the requirement itself, using a noun phrase.

identification is compulsory

Similar to "identification is mandatory", but with a slightly stronger emphasis on obligation.

FAQs

How should I correctly use "must" with the verb "identify"?

The correct forms are "must identify" (active voice) or "must be identified" (passive voice). For example, "The police must identify the suspect" or "The suspect must be identified by the police."

What does "must be identified" mean?

"Must be identified" means that it is necessary for someone or something to undergo the process of being recognized or ascertained. It implies an obligation or requirement for identification.

What are some alternatives to "must identify"?

Alternatives include "needs to identify", "is required to identify", or "has to identify". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is it ever correct to say "must identified"?

No, "must identified" is grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "must identify" or "must be identified". Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is not correct in written English.