In order to accomplish this, observed DNA sequences must be clustered into putative species.
These inversions must be classified as putative until we have direct cytological evidence.
If memetic evolution is to be evaluated fairly, the same level of criticism must be applied to all putative examples of selection from gene-based selection in biological evolution and the reaction of the immune system to antigens to the development of the central nervous system and social learning (Hull, Langman and Glenn 2001).
However, validation and polymorphic analysis must be performed before these putative SNPs can be used.
Consequently, validation and polymorphism analyses must be performed before these putative SNPs can be used because a large proportion of SNPs were identified from contigs with just a few sequences and may be sequencing errors.
Then, the question must be addressed whether the putative model possesses predictive validity, i.e. whether it allows predictions to be made about what it is supposed to model.
Finally, some method must be used to select putative low-copy genes, such as curated genome drafts from the study organism (de Sousa et al., 2014; Weitemier et al., 2014) or, when this information is absent, panels of loci derived from model organism genomes (Mandel et al., 2014; this study).
When we studied the strand specificity of the ribosomal motif (and motif variants), we found a pronounced abundance of the motif on the coding strand (it must be noted that a putative equally functional complementary motif is clearly just as abundant on the opposite strand).
Putative biomarkers must be evaluated with an independent validation set.
In the early stages of the scientific investigation of any phenomenon, putative samples must be identified by rough rules of thumb (or working definitions) rather than complete theories.
