Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes from both muscles were compared.
Temporal activation patterns from abdominal and lumbar muscles were compared between healthy control subjects and those with chronic low back pain.
There were no significant differences in the frequency of fibers that expressed 5-HT3A or both 5-HT3A aNaV1.81.8, when the two muscles were compared (P > .05, Students t-test).
As only two quadriceps muscles were compared, statistics were not performed.
Samples obtained from denervated muscles were compared with those obtained from control (intact) muscle, run in the same gel.
Differences between the two positions in bioelectrical activity of all muscles were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Similar(48)
As part of a cross-sectional, observational study on 90 patients with PM/DM described previously and focusing on cardiac disease [22, 23], 99mTc-PYP uptake in skeletal muscles was compared to the muscular uptake in 48 healthy controls.
These muscles are compared in the three species, below.
The innervation status of muscle fibers in transplanted muscles was compared with the innervation status of the contralateral, control muscles by determining the extent to which endplates labeled for ACh receptors were occupied by synaptophysin-labeled nerve terminals.
The carnosine concentration determined in human muscles was compared to that in the human kidney.
Maximum isometric force, range of motion, and muscle tension of hamstring muscle were compared between training regimes incorporating localized vibrations and traditional leg curl.
More suggestions(15)
force were compared
muscles were injected
muscles were implanted
muscles were examined
muscles were incised
muscles were analysed
muscles were mounted
muscles were dissected
muscles was compared
muscles examined compared
muscles were cramped
muscles were detached
muscles were prepared
muscles were omitted
muscles were stimulated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com