Exact(3)
The slope values for the RMS/force relationship were indicators of neuromuscular efficiency, thus weaker muscles were characterized by steeper slopes.
However, Trisk 95- and Trisk 51-infected skeletal muscles were characterized by the presence of fibrotic tissue, atrophic fibers, and regenerating fibers.
Indeed, 21 days after damage, muscles were characterized by non-homogenous regenerating fibers surrounded by large areas of fibrosis and fat, while muscles of sham-treated mice were devoided of fibrosis and showed complete regeneration.
Similar(57)
The angular displacement of those three bilayer muscles was characterized in NaCl aqueous solution by cyclic voltammetry and parallel video recording of the bending movement.
By contrast, pathological muscles are characterized by a broad distribution of mitochondrial markers in all fiber types, not related to intrinsic features of double muscle phenotype and by an increased expression of sarcolemmal calcium extrusion pump.
Dystrophic muscles are characterized by cycles of myofiber damage, necrosis, inflammation and finally regeneration or fibrosis.
Indeed, water in bone marrow and muscles is characterized by lower T2, compared to other tissues (such as brain tissue).
Furthermore, the extraocular muscles are characterized by abundant mitochondria and the presence of developmental and cardiac markers.
The skeletal muscle pathology, most prominent in weight-bearing muscles, was characterized by disorganized and nonaligned fibers, Z-disc streaming, and subsarcolemmal accumulation of mitochondria.
Contrary to the reciprocal innervation of limb muscles, pelvic floor muscles are characterized by synchronous and harmonic contractions [ 20] and prolonged tension (except for micturition and defecation) [ 21].
Histologically, dKO muscles are characterized by large inflammatory infiltrates and a high percentage of centrally nucleated myofibres, which reflect the continuous degeneration regeneration process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com