Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
By contrast, muscle weight of β2KO mice remained unchanged at 10 and 21 days post-cryolesion (Table 1).
In addition, feeding AA and the combination of AA and FOS increased the breast muscle weight of broiler chicks, while feeding FOS not significantly.
The Tibialis anterior muscle weight of IL10KO mice was lower than that of control mice, while GSE supplementation attenuated muscle loss in IL10KO mice.
At 1 day post-cryolesion, muscle weight of both WT and β2KO mice increased, when compared with the respective contralateral group (47 and 37% respectively; P ≤ 0.05; Table 1), but muscle weight of β2KO mice increased 13% less than that of WT mice, in the same period (P ≤ 0.05; Table 1).
When analysed at 10 days, muscle weight of WT mice decreased by 24%, when compared to its respective contralateral group (P ≤ 0.05; Table 1), whereas it was unaltered in β2KO mice.
The Musculus longissimus (ML) and Musculus quadriceps (MQ) were dissected and weighed, and muscle mass (MM) was recorded as summed muscle weight of left and right M. longissimus and left and right M. quadriceps.
Similar(45)
The weight ratio of the operated side was expressed as a percentage of the muscle weight on the contralateral normal side.
Phenotypic data for muscle weights of animals sampled for this experiment (Figure 2) show the characteristic muscle hypertrophy responses that have been previously reported for callipyge lambs [1] [3].
Muscle weights of collected tissues were measured at different ages and normalized to body weight, to account for runted phenotype of H-FRG1TG mice.
For example, muscle weights of F66/Mstn+/+ males obtained from crosses with Mstn+/− females were higher than those of F66/Mstn+/+ males obtained from crosses with Mstn+/+ females.
Similarly, muscle weights of F66/Mstn+/− males obtained from crosses with Mstn−/− females were higher than those of F66/Mstn+/− males obtained from crosses with Mstn+/− females.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com