Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
However, all observed effects were in the anticipated direction, and a joint multivariate test showed that this finding had a p-value of 0.012.
Similar(59)
Multivariate tests showed differences in health and aging parameters between males and females, and further, differences in male fish between ages and between sites.
P values from post hoc tests are displayed in Figures 1, 2, 3 whenever multivariate tests show significant overall effects.
Bonferroni's multivariate comparison test showed that there was a significant difference in the hemoglobin levels between patients with renal RI higher than the median value (0.70) and those with renal RI ≤0.7 only in the subgroup of 30 ≤ eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m.
Multivariate test results showed the Time (3 factors, beginning, middle, and end) X Benevolence interaction was statistically significant (F 2, 131) = 3.260, p = .042, partial-η2 = .047).047
The combined results were then entered into a joint multivariate test, which showed a p-value of 0.012.
The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the multivariate models demonstrated a good fit (p = 0.297), and there was no evidence for collinearity among the independent variables.
Before the multivariate analysis, a distribution analysis using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the telomere length data were normally distributed.
Multivariate tests indicate statistical values across all components.
Covariates for adjusted Cox analyses were prespecified as variables which were imbalanced in the randomisation arms, and adjusted for in multivariate analyses if univariate tests showed significant association with the outcomes.
The MANOVA carried out on the eight orientation tasks showed that despite the difference of means favouring men in almost every task (see Figure 2B) neither the multivariate test nor the univariate tests showed significant differences between men and women.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com