Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Age, LOS and GCS variables were used as continuous variables in the multivariate analysis instead of their categorical breakdowns.
When introduced in the multivariate analysis instead of seasonal influenza immunization behavior, the level of compliance with vaccination remained significant in the final model (OR = 3.15; 95% CI: 2.39 to 4.15).
Furthermore, HOMA-IR, TyG index, and McAuley index were not independent predictors of progranulin when included in multivariate analysis instead of adiponectin (data not shown).
Similar(57)
Instead, multivariate analysis allowed the finding of consistent variation patterns within the data set.
Instead, multivariate analysis was repeated with each of the methods used for the measurement of free hemoglobin.
Logistic univariate regression was chosen as inferential analysis, instead of multivariate logistic regression for the lack of data, and it checked the relation between the presence/absence at least one of disease as a dependent variable and each oxidative stress marker as an independent variable.
For this situation, a multivariate analysis of variance was used instead.
Instead of limiting the multivariate analysis to the significant terms from the univariate analysis, we included all variables because these factors have been previously demonstrated to be important in predicting disease recurrence in adult PTC patients.
Very large samples would be needed for an adequately powered multivariate analysis with many variables and so we focused instead on core constructs of language and reading based on a range of measures.
We included serum bicarbonate instead of arterial lactate in the multivariate analysis, because we had missing data on lactate levels, which probably contributed to the lack of significance of arterial lactate in the multivariate model.
When GFR instead of creatinine was included in this multivariate analysis, GFR remained independently associated with serum FGF21 concentrations (β coefficient −0.296, −0.529 to −0.063, P = 0.014).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com