Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
In multivariate analyses, significant potentially modifiable predictors were symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (HR: 2.13, 1.19 3.80), autonomic symptom score (HR per point 0 36: 1.055, 1.012 1.099), and Cornell depression score (HR per point 0 40: 1.01 1.0991.01 1.099
In multivariate analyses, significant risk factors for clinical deterioration were HIV-1 infection and a low CD4+ count at tuberculosis diagnosis.
In the multivariate analyses, significant differences were found only for HCW born in 1965 1980 with respect to those born in 1981 and after, with an adjusted OR of 5.67 (95% CI: 1.24-25.91) (Table 1).
In multivariate analyses, significant predictors of the presence of depressive symptoms were difficulties with basic ADLs (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1.7.8), risk for social isolation (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.8 9.3), and basic education only (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 4.4).
Similar(56)
Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant differences between the copepod species composition of the experimental sites.
Multivariate analyses detected significant differences between all five diets (P<0.0001) primarily due to acid detergent fiber (ADF) and CP digestibilities and DE.
Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between IT and MF neurochemical data (SNARE proteins and/or complexes), and multiple age-related neuropathologies, as well as with multiple cognitive domains of MAP participants.
Multivariate analyses indicated significant differences in assemblage composition due to both patch size and in-patch location, and revealed that differences were due to small changes in the relative abundances of many taxa.
However, using spatial multivariate analyses, a significant clinal pattern was detected within the woodland landscape only (Figure 3).
Univariate and multivariate analyses showed significant associations between levels of NAT1 and DFS.
Bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant differences across hospitals of different size and accreditation status [ 9].
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com