Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Table 4 Risk factors for peri-implantitis Peri-implantitis n Univariate analyses Multivariate analyses OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P Subjects GAP 3 5 7.50.931.931; 60.427) 0.054 n.s.s
Table 3 Risk factors for mucositis Mucositis n Univariate analyses Multivariate analyses OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P Subjects GAP 3 5 4.50.601.601; 3.708) 0.138 n.s.s
The transformed weight centile variable was significant in univariate and multivariate analyses (OR for death of 1.02; P = 0.000 in multivariate analysis).
This association was still present when we controlled for the interrelations between the variables in the multivariate analyses (OR = 0.84, p = 0.03).
In multivariate analyses, OR (95% CI) of atypical femoral fracture was 4.30 (1.55 to 11.9) in ever versus never users of bisphosphonates.
Patients who responded to the prior cetuximab or panitumumab were more likely to obtain clinical benefit to the retreatment compared to the non-responders in both univariate (p = 0.007) and multivariate analyses (OR: 3.38, 95 % CI: 1.27, 9.31, p = 0.019).
Similar(50)
In the logistic regression models, case/referent was the dependent variable and problems at baseline and problems at follow-up were independent variables, separately for the bivariate analyses (Crude OR) and combined in the same model for the multivariate analyses (Adjusted OR).
From the multivariate analyses, postmaturity (OR 3.07).
The persistence of KP in men was associated with carrying or handling heavy loads on univariate analyses and with kneeling on multivariate analyses, with ORs of 1.3(1.0-1.6 1.0-1.6) and 1.6(1.0-2.6) (Cosali).
These results were significant in multivariate analyses (hand/wrist region OR: 4.3 [95%-CI: 2.1 - 8.6]; knee region OR: 3.0 [95%-CI: 1.5 - 6.0]).
Table 2 shows that esophageal cancer was not related to DM in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71-1.37).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com