Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Among all recorded factors, only renal failure (as assessed by renal SOFA score at day 1) was associated with NOSVA and this difference persisted by multivariable analysis (odds ratio of 1.29, 95%% CI 1.03 1.62, p = 0.03).
In multivariable analysis, odds ratios were adjusted for all other risk predictors that were assessed.
The authors even concluded that profound hypothermia was an independent predictor of composite outcome by multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 7.6; 95% confidence interval: 3.0 21.1).
This correlation persisted in multivariable analysis: odds ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 4.6, P = 0.01) for thromboembolic event, and odds ratio of 5.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.9 to 12.8, P <0.01) for poor outcome.
Yet, delirium remained associated with mild and severe problems with cognitive functioning in multivariable analysis (odds ratios: 2.41; 95% CI 1.57 to 3.69 and 3.10; 95% CI 1.10 to 8.74, respectively).
Treatment intensity was strongly correlated with the GC-predicted probability of metastasis (P < 0.001) and the GC test was the dominant risk factor driving decisions in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 8.6, 95% CI: 5.3 14.3%; P < 0.001).
Similar(52)
In multivariable analysis, higher odds of P. falciparum infection were associated with younger age and being stunted, whereas lower odds were associated with reported net use, higher parental education, and socioeconomic status.
In multivariable analysis the odds of a hypoglycemic episode increased by >2.5-fold for patients receiving scheduled insulin (P < 0.0001).
In multivariable analysis, the odds of inpatient mortality increased threefold for every 10 mg/dl decrease in the lowest blood glucose (P = 0.0058).
In the multivariable analysis, the odds of frequent and excessive testing as compared with guideline recommended testing increased with patient complexity.
Adjusted for associations with known clinical prognosticators, including ER status, in a multivariable analysis, this odds ratio slightly increases to 1895%5% confidence interval = 3.3 94, P = 0.0002) [ 2].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com