Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
The EULAR recommendations suggested multiplying the SCORE or Framingham risk score by a factor of 1.5 in patients with a) disease duration of more than ten years, b) rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibiody (ACPA) positivity, and c) presence of extra-articular manifestations [ 9].
By multiplying the score and the global weight and summing all these values for each mining method, a total score for the specific mining method is obtained.
Multiplying the score function with respect to location by the variance gives begin{aligned} u_{t}=sigma ^{2}frac{partial ln f_{t}}{partial mu _{tshortmid t-1}} =sigma hleft[ (xi +varsigma )b_{t}(xi,varsigma )-xi right], end{aligned} (17 where begin{aligned} b_{t}(xi,varsigma )=frac{e^{left( y_{t}-mu _{tshortmid t-1}right) h/sigma }}{ e^{left( y_{t}-mu _{tshortmid t-1}right) h/sigma }+1}.
Results were calculated by multiplying the score of percentage of positive cells (P) by the intensity (I).
For each case, a final score from the nucleus and the cytoplasm was obtained by multiplying the score of intensity with the score of percentage, 12 being the maximum final score.
The final IHS was obtained by multiplying the score of extent and intensity.
Similar(45)
An index is calculated by multiplying the scores per factor.
Second, the traditional FMEA determines the risk priorities of failure modes using the risk priority numbers (RPNs) by multiplying the scores of the risk factors like the occurrence (O), severity (S) and detection (D) of each failure mode.
In traditional FMEA, the risk priorities of failure modes are determined by using risk priority numbers (RPNs), which can be obtained by multiplying the scores of risk factors like occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D).
The level of Skp2 staining was evaluated by immunoreactive score (IRS) [17], which is calculated by multiplying the scores of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells.
Immuno-reactive scores were calculated by multiplying the scores for the area and highest intensity of positivity.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com