Exact(2)
Multiplying the resultant by the right pseudo-inverse of the H T, we derive H ( H T H ) − 1 H T y ̂ = H ( H T H ) − 1 H T ν = ν ~ (42).
Differentiating (8 1 with respect to x i, then multiplying the resultant equation by ∂ i ρ |∂ i ρ | r -2, i = 1, 2, 3 and then integrating over Ω, we have d d t ∫ ∂ i ρ r d x ≤ C ∫ ( ∇ v ∇ ρ r + ρ ∇ ρ r - 1 ∇ 2 v ) d x.
Similar(58)
Multiply the resultant signal from step 3a by the final result from step 2. Take the IFFT of the outcome of step 3b.
(b) Multiply the resultant signal from step 3a by the final result from step 2. (c) Take the IFFT of the outcome of step 3b.
By pre-multiplying the resultant syndrome equation in (28) by, is found to be.
Now we pre-multiply the resultant syndrome equation in (23) by the matrix, which is the column-wise reverse of [4].
In the worst case, the receiver has to perform FFT for β = 20 0.5 + 1 = 41 shifted versions of the input signal and multiply the resultant signal each time by the conjugate FFT of the PRN code.
Multiply the resulting number.
Multiply the result by 100.
Multiply the results by pi.
The resultant total heat energy is calculated to be 40 kJ by multiplying the total heat energy density (which is equal to the peak energy, 250 MW/m3, by a definition of Gaussian function) and the volume of the shoe section (160 cm3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com