Sentence examples for multiple surface restorations from inspiring English sources

All published reports of this systematic review indicated no differences between HVGIC and amalgam, beyond the play of chance (p > 0.05) in the permanent dentition after four and six years for single and multiple surface tooth restorations, respectively, and no differences after three years for single and multiple surface restorations in primary teeth [ 6, 7, 10].

Class II restorations (n = 107) were recorded as multiple-surface restorations.

The survival rates of multiple-surface restorations (Class II) decreased significantly from 2 to 10 years.

The difference between the survival percentages of single- and multiple-surface restorations was tested using the jackknife SE.

After 2 years, the survival rates between single- and multiple-surface restorations were similar (92.7 × 86.8%, respectively).

After 10 years, the replacement rates observed were 16%and29%9% for single- and multiple-surface restorations, respectively.

It had been suggested that resin-modified glass ionomer should be used to improve the survival of multiple-surface restorations in primary teeth [ 20– 20].

There were no statistically significant differences between single- and multiple-surface restorations at 1-year (p = 0.137) and 2-year (p = 0.377) evaluations.

After 10 years, the examiners evaluated 129 posterior restorations, in that 67 were single- and 62 were multiple-surface restorations, in 20 patients.

One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5).

However, a statistical difference was apparent over the 10-year evaluation period (65.2 × 30.6% success rate for single- and multiple-surface restorations, respectively).