Sentence examples for multiple studies because from inspiring English sources

Incorrect positive conclusions regarding carcinogenicity may also occur in reviews of multiple studies because of publication bias, which may selectively populate the literature only with "positive" findings.

Some techniques, such as methylation-specific PCR, can be very sensitive, and it is reassuring when results are available from a large number of tumors and multiple studies because the frequencies of methylation for individual genes can show considerable variation (Table 1).

All major risk factors with multiple studies were downgraded because of study quality, as their median Newcastle-Ottawa scale score was always below 7. Inconsistency and imprecision were also common for most major risk factors (tables 3-5).

For students, we attend to gender because multiple studies indicate that women are more likely to leave their STEM intentions after their experiences in STEM courses such as Calculus I (Ellis et al. 2016; Seymour and Hewitt 1997).

The actual number of trauma victims where OCI may have made the difference between life and death is unknown because multiple studies have shown that these injuries can be missed with current diagnostic methods.

The women who leave go into other industries, and multiple studies say it's because they're unhappy with their pay and promotional opportunities.

Because multiple studies exist for each given health incidence, pooling techniques are often used to statistically combine the results.

However, the finding of XMRV in PBMCs from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome is controversial because multiple studies in Europe have failed to detect XMRV (6 – 8 ).

No genotyping was performed for GR ER22/23EK (rs6189 6190) because multiple studies show that it is not polymorphic in the Chinese population [ 33– 33].

Finally, we measured frontostriatal responses during a reward processing task because multiple studies have reported altered neural mechanisms of reward processing in MDD (for a review, see [ 21]).

A value of four was chosen because multiple studies on publication bias estimated the ratio of the probability of publishing studies showing statistically significant positive results to the probability of publishing other results as close to four.