Sentence examples for multiple sites considered from inspiring English sources

This equation can be written in the following form: Open image in new window (19 where the parameters a, b, c and d take the values a = x2 + ½, b = x1+α ½, c = x4 + ½, d = x3 + ½ for the prior given by Eq. 10, and the values a = Σx2i + ½, b = Σx1i + nα ½, c = Σx4k + ½, d = Σx3k + ½ in case of multiple sites considered as a whole, with the prior given in Eq. 15.

It can be written in a more generic form: Open image in new window (17 where the parameters a, b, c and d take the values a = x2 + ½, b = x1 + ½, c = x4 + ½, d = x3 + ½ for the Jeffreys's rule prior (Eq. 8), and the values a = Σx2i + ½, b = Σx1i + ½, c = Σx4k + ½, d = Σx3k + ½ in case of multiple sites considered as a whole (with the Jeffreys's rule prior; see Section 6), for example.

The case of multiple treated sites considered independently and with possibly different odds ratios remains to be dealt with.

Since histopathological examinations failed to identify disseminated bacterial colonies or a florid inflammatory response, recovery of Escherichia coli from multiple sites was considered more likely to be the result of post-mortem tissue invasion than disseminated systemic infection.

Biopsy of multiple sites was not considered, out of concern for patient comfort.

Until recently, A. maculatum was considered an incidental tick species in North Carolina (12, 13 ); however, we identified an overall prevalence of R. parkeri in 29% of A. maculatum ticks from multiple sites in North Carolina considered endemic for RMSF.

Comparing the two methods, both assays allow rapid identification of A. catenella without time-consuming microscopy when multiple sites need to be considered in routine monitoring.

In another three pairs of runs we ran PhyloScan, permitting it to consider multiple sites within an intergenic region, but by disabling its Bailey-Gribskov calculation (see Methods) PhyloScan could not consider more than one clade, and we gave it only the sequence data from the Enterobacteriales clade.

In the case of reads mapping in multiple sites, for gene prediction we considered them all, while for gene expression we considered only the reads mapping to unique genomic positions.

This study was conducted at multiple sites and can therefore be considered more representative of clinical practice in the US compared to previous studies.

To identify variants with much lower frequency, phylogenetic relationships among multiple sites, termed phasing, need to be considered [ 12].