Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(21)
It could be argued that multiple significance testing would lead to several significant associations by chance alone.
Due to multiple significance testing, a p value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing.
Therefore, the problem of multiple significance testing that inflates the type 1 error rate in single SNP analyses does not apply to MDR analyses.
No adjustments were made for multiple significance testing [ 15].
No corrections were made for multiple significance testing.
Similar(39)
This caution reflects the problem of multiplicity, which arises whenever multiple significance tests are conducted on a dataset.
After adjustment for multiple significance tests, one effect was statistically significant (average P-value was 0.61): the interaction between dopamine and climatic demands was significant for Openness/Intellect when measured with the OPQ (B = 0.34, P < 0.005).
The Bonferroni method was applied to allow for multiple significance tests with adjusted p-values <0.01 regarded as statistically significant.
We adjusted for multiple significance tests by applying a sequential Bonferroni adjustment within each of the clusters [20].
To control the inflated Type I error rate associated with multiple significance tests, the false discovery rate procedure developed by Benjamini and Hochberg was used to calculate adjusted p-values.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com