Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Statistical significance was determined by one-tailed t test assuming unequal variance for two sample comparison and by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test for multiple sample comparisons.
Normalized signals were used for class comparisons of variance by two-way t-tests for two sample comparisons and parametric univariate F-tests for multiple sample comparisons (p<0.001, FDRs<2%; BRB-ArrayTools, (http://linus.nci.nih.gov/BRB-ArrayTools.html) to identify significantly differentially expressed genes.
This is especially useful for multiple sample comparisons; (ii) Gene classification was based on multiple comparison.
One-way analysis of variance and a Tukey or Dunnett's posttest was performed for multiple sample comparisons.
The statistical significance of the gene expression was calculated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple sample comparisons (SAS v9.4 software).
Statistical analysis was done using one tailed students t-test for pair wise comparison or ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test for multiple sample comparisons.
Similar(51)
Multiple samples comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (parametric) or Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks (non- parametric).
ANOVAs and multiple-samples comparisons were performed with the Statgraphics® software.
Multiple-samples comparisons were performed between genotypes for each treatment independently.
Multiple-samples comparisons were carried out using the Fisher test (Least Significant Difference) at the 5% threshold.
Such a log rank test follows a χ2 distribution in the case of multiple-sample comparison; in the case of two-sample comparisons, it computes a Z score referred to a normal distribution.
More suggestions(15)
multiple sample collections
multiple sample pairs
multiple sample areas
multiple sample sets
multiple sample libraries
multiple sample studies
multiple sample positions
multiple sample sizes
multiple sample groups
multiple sample runs
multiple sample dilutions
multiple sample dates
multiple sample directions
multiple sample conditions
multiple sample types
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com