Sentence examples for multiple prognoses from inspiring English sources

Confronted with the fact that (multiple) prognoses only create an illusion of knowledge instead of scientific knowledge, scientists might answer that they are using the best instruments available.

The inconsiderate use of (multiple) prognoses about the future – although sometimes explicitly stating the overall caveat of ceteris paribus or rebus sic stantibus – is a root-cause of a strong and, especially in the case of scenarios camouflaged as multiple prognoses, very convincing illusion of knowledge.

The biggest potential from this set of rules, although not exhaustive and illustrated, lays in its capability to distinguish between good and bad scenarios, between real alternative thought experiments and multiple prognoses.

Scenarios are illustrations about alternative possible futures but the more scientific knowledge they create, the more they transform into multiple prognoses, the less they are useful as an instrument to scientifically expose the future.

Would-be scenarios in the form of multiple prognoses are in turn assumed to be very useful to make insecure strategic situations more secure as they are meant to represent justifiable knowledge.

The concepts and rules for a scientific enquiry into the future developed in this article can help to clearly differentiate between multiple prognoses and scenarios, and to evaluate scenarios by scientific means.

We used only datasets in which a healthy tissue was compared to the disease tissue (i.e., datasets with multiple prognosis-based cohorts were excluded).

Un-surprisingly, then, the bone metastasis gene expression program has little overlap with the 70-gene poor prognosis signature, while the LMS has significant overlap with multiple poor prognosis signatures and can indeed be used for effective prognostication.

The next associated high-expression sets were for doxorubicin treatment in gastric cancer, breast cancer prognosis (70-gene) and prognosis of different cancer types not examined in this study (hepatocellular carcinoma and multiple myeloma prognosis).

Enrichment of multiple poor prognosis genetic alterations in ccB samples indicated that several events may be required to establish this aggressive phenotype, catalysed in some tumours by chromosomal instability.

Building off of the SLAMS approach, Wolfer et al. [ 48] searched for potential regulators of multiple poor prognosis signatures using the MCF7 breast cancer cell line as a testing platform.