Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
For the analysis of migrating Panc-1 and migrating MiaPaCa-2 cell lines, probes were excluded that showed less than a ±25% change in expression from rim to core, and genes were excluded that had multiple probes respectively showing both positive and negative changes.
Similar(59)
Some of the notable differences between the GeneChip and CodeLink systems are, respectively, multiple probes vs. one pre-validated probe per gene target, two-dimensional surface vs. three-dimensional array matrix, and in situ synthesized oligonucleotides vs. pre-synthesized, non-contact oligonucleotide deposition.
To better isolate the effects of alternative splicing, we reduced the effect of cross-hybridization by removing from the analysis the 6.5%, 3.1% and 3.5% of individual Affymetrix, Agilent and Codelink probes, respectively, that matched multiple AceView gene symbols.
Notably, multiple probes for Gli2 and Smo were attenuated by 4.2, and 3.2-fold respectively (Table S3).
For the incomplete digests, clear ladder patterns of the expected lengths were observed, namely, multiples of 185 and 344 bp for the OwlAlp1 and OwlAlp2 probes, respectively.
Firstly, multiple droplets containing the same target mixtures are generated in the microchannel, and then fused with later generated different droplets containing corresponding probes, respectively.
In this biosensor, two hairpin probes were designed as capture probes and signal probes, respectively.
In cases with multiple probes per gene the most variable probe was selected, resulting in 18,295 unique genes.
In cases with multiple probes per gene the most variable probe was selected, resulting in 18,295 unique coding genes.
Replicated probes and multiple probes representing the same gene showed perfect correlation between them suggesting good probe performance.
As shown in Figure 4c, the first row was printed with ginseng probes and the second was printed with Codonopsis probes respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com