Ai Feedback
Exact(18)
We only tested multiple probes in the current study.
High probe density results in each of the transcription units being represented by multiple probes, in contrast to "one-probe-one-gene" in expression microarrays.
In approximately 20% of the cases, multiple probes in the microarray targeted onto a single gene.
Among them, five genes were differentially expressed according to multiple probes in the microarray platform.
After merging multiple probes, in total there were 18503 genes and 202 miRNAs.
For the genes represented with multiple probes in microarray, the probe with the highest average signal intensity was used.
Similar(42)
The proposed analysis makes use of the multiple probes contained in each probe set.
Several genes were represented on the array by multiple probes and in those cases we only used the expression data of the most 3'-located probe.
However, the most pertinent methylation differences are represented by the same directional log2 (HpaIIr/McrBCr) changes across multiple probes that are in close proximity to one another on the genome; thus, we identified loci with more than two differentially methylated probes.
When multiple probes were present in the microarray corresponding to a gene, we selected the probe with the highest absolute correlation.
The Nimblegen arrays that were hybridized with cDNA prepared from each parasite population contained multiple probes per gene (in most cases, eight), and three copies of these probe-sets per chip.
Related(20)
several probes in
multiple detectors in
various probes in
multiple measurements in
multiple investigators in
multiple interrogations in
multiple sensors in
multiple investigations in
multiple overtimes in
multiple vulnerabilities in
multiple videos in
multiple times in
multiple advances in
multiple deals in
multiple orgasms in
multiple protests in
multiple continents in
multiple sacrifices in
multiple sheeshes in
multiple operations in
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com