Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Multiple means were compared by a two-way analysis of the variance (ANOVA) to test the effects of genotype and applied stress (GraphPad Prism 6.0, San Diego, CA, USA).
Differences between means were determined by two-way ANOVAs with mouse and treatment as factors using DataDesk 6.2 software (Data Description, Ithaca, New York) and protected Fischer's Least Square Difference post-hoc testing where significance was taken as p<0.05 when multiple means were compared.
Differences among multiple means were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.
Comparisons of multiple means were accomplished by one-way analysis of variance followed by a 150 Tukey's post-hoc test.
Statistical significance with respect to pairwise comparison was calculated using Student's t-test, and multiple means were compared by one-way ANOVA.
All data are shown as the mean ± S.E.M. Comparisons of multiple means were performed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (for homogeneous variance) as indicated.
Similar(52)
Comparison of multiple means was performed with nonparametric ANOVA.
Statistical analysis of multiple means was performed with ANOVA, including Tukey's post hoc test.
We demonstrate that heterologous genes can be introduced to Thermotoga through multiple means, be functionally expressed, and be stably maintained.
Comparison of multiple means was carried out by multiple covariate analysis, adjusted for baseline values (bone markers, BMD, MANCOVA).
This ability to produce the same result by multiple means is a common feature of complex systems.
More suggestions(15)
various means were
multiple needs were
multiple methodologies were
multiple mechanisms were
multiple weapons were
multiple instruments were
multiple religions were
multiple barriers were
multiple supporters were
multiple complaints were
multiple victims were
multiple factors were
multiple procedures were
multiple indels were
multiple accessions were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com